Showing posts with label Foreclosure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foreclosure. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Credit Unworthy

Ill-behaved Indian borrowers will now find it tough to hide from authorities


One morning, two years ago, when the officials of the Asset Reconstruction Company of India Ltd (ARCIL), which buys and sells bad loans acquired from banks, turned up at a Bangalore housing complex to repossess a defaulter's flats, they were nonplussed. The defaulter's tenants - a police inspector, a politician and a small-time businessman - were all influential. One had removed all the locks on the outside of the front door. Despite the backing of an order from the chief metropolitan magistrate and a team of cops, the ARCIL officials could do little but request the tenant to open the door. Morning passed into afternoon, and finally the police decided to smash in the door. Alarmed by the noise, the tenant finally opened it. The second tenant threatened the ARCIL team with dire consequences. The third threatened to commit suicide. "We persisted with our request for the lease agreements executed by the defaulting borrower," says an ARCIL official. But the tenants cited the law to prevent the officials from entering the flats. After much discussion, the tenants sought 10 days to find other accommodation, and promised in writing to vacate.

The story did not end there.

"We granted them the time, as the police also advised us," the ARCIL official said. But the very next day, the tenants obtained a temporary stay on the repossession order, from the debt recovery tribunal. The ARCIL officials are still doing the rounds of the court to repossess the flats.

There is no dearth of stories about defaulters using every means possible to scuttle the legal process. A jewellery exporter offered disguised copper alloy as part of the collateral for a loan, and later sued the bank for his 'missing' gold. In another case, ARCIL had to arrange a contingent of 200 policemen and private security guards to repossess a textile manufacturing company's factories.

"We end up getting the most difficult borrowers," says P. Rudran, Managing Director and CEO, ARCIL. Bankers tend to sell whatever they cannot recover on their own, he explains.

The concept of focused asset reconstruction companies for the recovery of non-performing assets (NPAs) was born in early 2000 to help banks. The 63-year-old Rudran, who operates from a tenth-floor office in a suburban Mumbai tower, has his work cut out, judging by the mounting NPAs in the banking system.
Arun Thukral, CEO of credit tracker CIBIL, at Mumbai's busy Churchgate station. He says: 'A bad credit history can mean trouble. If fresh loans won't go to bad borrowers, it naturally improves the credit culture.

Gross NPAs are expected to touch 3.5 per cent, and corporate debt restructuring, 5.7 per cent, of total advances in the banking industry in 2012/13. Loans and advances in the system stood at Rs 50.74 trillion (a trillion equals 100,000 crore) in 2011/12. 

Rudran's ARCIL so far has bought nearly Rs 50,000 crore worth of NPAs in the past decade.

"No one borrows money to default, and not all NPAs are wilful defaults," says S. Ravi, who runs a chartered accountancy firm in South Delhi, and also sits on the board of IDBI Bank Ltd. "You have to separate the wheat from the chaff," he adds.

Ravi's argument can be justified, as even good borrowers can get trapped in NPAs because of ups and downs in the economy, a sudden rise in interest rates, inflation and other reasons beyond their control.

But Indian borrowers can be reckless, too. The track record suggests that a part of stressed assets turns into wilful defaulters. The value of suits filed against defaulters has more than doubled in five years to reach Rs 23,439 crore in 2011/12. 

The alarming trend of borrowers disposing of assets prompted the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to expand the definition of 'wilful defaulter'. Before 2008, it simply meant someone who had the capacity to repay, or who diverted or siphoned off borrowed money. Now, the definition includes promoters who dispose of collateral assets without the knowledge of the lending bank.


Another symptom of bad credit behaviour is the over four million cases of bounced cheques - mostly retail - pending in the courts. The volume of bounced cheques is equivalent to the volume of cheques issued every month in a city the size of Ahmedabad, Bangalore or Kolkata.

Do Indians have a cavalier attitude towards timely payment ? Some in the industry believe so. For example, global credit insurer Atradius, present in India for well over a decade, has documented payment delays in the country, and found that business-to-business payment delays of more than three months stood at 8.4 per cent of domestic invoices in November 2012 - well above the Asia average of 5.5 per cent. And the value of uncollectable (written off) business-to-business receivables was 7.5 per cent in India, compared to the Asia average of 5.3 per cent.

This would make any foreigner hesitate to do business with Indian promoters. "We have seen delays in the IT sector or amongst the small and medium enterprises," says Arun Rajan, country manager, Atradius.

This bad payment habit extends to bank loans. Even some young borrowers, such as students, default, in their first relationship with a bank. Today, gross NPAs in education loans are over seven per cent of advances. As that number is rising, banks are going slow on education loans. Former finance minister Pranab Mukherjee had even proposed a credit guarantee fund to compensate the banks, but it never materialised for lack of budgetary allocation. RBI Deputy Governor K.C. Chakrabarty highlighted the problem of student loan defaults during a lecture at the Noida-based JRE School of Management last year. "I suggest school alumni associations should become active in inculcating ethics and values among students," he said.

Sudip Bandyopadhyay, former CEO of Reliance Money, who now runs a firm called Destimoney Securities Pvt Ltd, says students are not mature borrowers. "Also, many times, the placement is not commensurate with the money spent on a course," he says.

Bankers say students sometimes leave the country without paying up. "We don't have a good tracking system - it is still evolving," says IDBI's Ravi. Some experts suggest that banks could reach out to such defaulters through their parents or by coordinating with immigration authorities.


Another area where borrowers often behave erratically is credit cards. Bankers have turned extremely cautious here: RBI data shows that the number of credit cards actually fell from 23.1 million in March 2007 to 17.7 million in March 2012. Card spend has, however, increased from Rs 41,400 crore to Rs 96,600 crore. "It is better to have a few good customers than many bad ones," says Bandyopadhyay of Destimoney. Bankers say nonsalaried people with an irregular income are more likely to default.

Foreign banks and their non-banking arms, too, have had bitter experiences in consumer finance after the economic downturn in 2008. Fullerton India, a non-banking finance company (NBFC) backed by Singapore-based Temasek Holdings, started with a nearly 90 per cent unsecured lending portfolio around five years ago. It suffered huge losses in the unsecured segment, with gross NPAs rising to over 10 per cent in the overall business. Since then, it has cut its exposure to half in the unsecured segment, especially personal loans.

The only disciplined borrowers, data suggests, are mortgaged borrowers. "We haven't seen people not paying up on a home or car loan in India," says Arun Thukral, CEO of the 12-year-old Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd, or CIBIL. The bureau keeps records of all banks' borrowers, assigning each a credit score between 300 and 900, where 900 indicates the best repayment behaviour. The score helps a new lender assess the credit behaviour of an individual or company.

Thukral points out that Indians are not as leveraged as borrowers in the US or UK, but adds that credit tracking infrastructure is well developed in those countries, recovery mechanisms are more robust and borrowers are mature enough to admit to mistakes. "Post-2008, we all heard the stories of people leaving their cars on the road or abandoning their well furnished flats for bankers to repossess," says Bandyopadhyay. ARCIL's Rudran says he is not hopeful of such behaviour in India any time soon.

The lack of credit tracking infrastructure in India until recently has contributed to borrowers' lax attitude towards financial obligations. "There was always another bank ready to welcome you with open arms," says a banker who does not want to be named.

CIBIL is still struggling to rope in many institutions to get a better picture of credit behaviour. Four leading cooperative bank associations in Maharashtra joined CIBIL 10 long years after it was set up. "Politicians sell the loan waiver carrot, advising farmers not to repay banks," says an NBFC official who travels extensively in rural India. Banks are wary of lending to farmers as this segment has a history of default.

Sanjay Agarwal, group head for retail business at ARCIL, says there is a tendency in India to resort to litigation to scuttle the recovery process. For instance, he says, as soon as ARCIL buys an NPA from a bank, the borrower approaches the court, challenging the asset transfer.

"There are cases that are unresolved for more than eight years," says ARCIL's Rudran. "Asset recovery is a very tough business. You have to find out new methods to deal with rogue borrowers." He adds that defaulters often make all sorts of excuses and try to stymie the recovery process by approaching the courts.

"The borrower also uses indirect pressure from influential people," says a banker in the NPA department of a public sector bank who has received many calls from politicians. Deepak Gupta, Joint Managing Director, Kotak Bank - one of the few banks that specialise in buying NPAs from other banks - concurs, saying: "Most corporate default cases get resolved only through courts."

P. Rudran, MD & CEO, ARCIL, at the Bombay High Court, where many default cases are heard. He says: 'Some cases are unresolved for over 8 years. Asset recovery is a tough business. You have to find new ways to deal with rogue borrowers.' (Photo: Nishikant Gamre)

The courts are flooded with such cases. Take, for example, litigation between companies and banks over forex derivatives contracts. Many midsize exporters and importers who hedged their foreign currency risk suffered losses when the rupee-dollar rate moved beyond their comfort zone. Companies that had foreign currency exposure blamed the banks for mis-selling, and banks countered by saying the companies had failed to read the fine print. In November last year, the Supreme Court settled the wrangle by ruling that 'wilful default' covers not only normal banking transactions such as borrowing and lending, but also derivatives contracts. The borrowers lost, and bankers can now go after defaulters in derivatives contracts.

Another reason for bad behaviour by borrowers is the multiplicity of lenders. Apart from banks, there are NBFCs of varying shapes and sizes, microfinance institutions, district cooperative banks and regional rural banks and unregistered sources. At a recent seminar, Anand Sinha, another RBI Deputy Governor, cited the example of Andhra Pradesh, where microfinance institutions lent indiscriminately. "This would not have reached the proportions it did if there was information-sharing amongst MFIs," says Sinha.

CIBIL's Thukral says the bureau is gradually helping improve the credit culture, as more and more people are aware that a bad credit history can mean trouble. Banks put credit bureau reports at the top of their checklist. "If fresh loans won't go to bad borrowers, it naturally improves the culture," says Thukral.

With the role of credit reports becoming more important, some see a business opportunity. Two Mumbai-based entrepreneurs have set up Credit Sudhaar, a startup that offers advisory services to improve one's credit score. "Our clients are not only those who made a mistake in the past, but also those who want to maintain a good credit score," says co-founder Arun Ramamurthy, who formerly worked with Citibank.

CIBIL's Thukral says it is a reflection of growing awareness that hassled borrowers sometimes walk in or call CIBIL's helpline to discuss negatives in their report. "The cultural fabric of India is very different from the West," says Thukral. "Our parents and grandparents keep reminding us: jitni chadar ho utnay hi paon phelane chahiye (stretch your legs only as far as your blanket will go)."

Today, the CIBIL effect is not restricted to borrowing . A European bank in India, for example, requires job applicants in India to submit credit reports before it offers them a job. A professional who works for a private company and does not wish to be identified, said his friend was asked for a credit report when he approached Delhi Public School for admission for his daughter.

The possibilities for rogue borrowers to hide are shrinking. Taking the locks off a door or moving to another city won't work much longer. Time to check your credit score.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Take over of Management of An Engineering Institute.

Yerneni Bhargav, Managing Partner, Foreclosureindia.com


Hyderabad :  SARFEASI Act ,section 13 (4) (b) specifies that " Take over the management of the business of the Borrower including the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realising the secured asset: One of the Public sector Bank has issued a Lease /Sale Notice for Take over of the Management of an Engineering Institute. The notice is published below for information.



      All the Borrowers of the Banks and Financial Institutions shall be vigilant about their loans to safe guard their management control of their businesses.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

RBI permits banks to set their own foreclosure terms for Term Deposits

The Reserve Bank of India has has decided to permit banks to set their own policies regarding foreclosures of Term Deposits, Daily Deposits and Recurring Deposits for the purpose of better Asset Liability Management (ALM).

Originally the banks were bond by the condition that when a Term Deposit is foreclosed for the purpose of a new term deposit in the same branch no fine/penalty can be levied as long as the new term deposit is for a longer period than the balance time of the original one.

 This change now lets the banks formulate their own interest rate policies on foreclosure of term deposits.


RBI Circulars Issued on 28.5.2012:




Saturday, May 26, 2012

BANK AUCTIONS - UNSOLD PROPETIES - AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BARGAIN HUNTING


Y.Bhargav, Managing Partner, FORECLOSUREINDIA.COM, 25.5.2012:

Hyderabad : Most of the Public sector Banks and Private sector Banks are Auctioning the immovable properties under SARFEASI Act. The rate of success of selling of the properties through Bank Auctions is varying from around 40 % to 60 % depending on the city, market sentiment, political situations etc.

As per the observations during the last two and half years, the primary reasons for less success rate are :

1. Inappropriate reserve price: Some of the Authorized Officers are finalizing the reserve price over and above the distressed price recommended by the Govt. approved valuer. They are some times not considering the external factors like market sentiment like recession, political situations like etc.

2. Lack of publicity to the Auctions : To fulfill the mandatory requirements and save cost of news papers publication, some of the Banks are publishing the Auction Notices in non prominent news papers.

Wide publicity is required like displaying of Banners, distribution of pamplets, publishing in Internet portals etc.Internet users in India are 110 millions, i.e 11 crores, as against All English news papers readers at 20 millions, i.e 2 crores. Publishing in Internet portals is damn cheap at 4 % cost of English news paper advertisement cost and it gives 25 times more publicity.

3. Lack of proper facility to inspect the property in advance: Inspection of the property is being arranged a few days before the Auction date.

Inspection facility is required immediately after publishing of the Auction notice and at least on one public holidays or after office hours so that interested investors and their family members can inspect the property to take appropriate decision.

4. Loan facility to buy these Properties : Some of the Banks and Housing financial Institutions are not giving loans for these properties.

Banks / Financial Institutions will have to come forward to give quick loans to buy these properties to create a Vibrant Bank auctions market / Foreclosures market in India. Interested Investors must also get the sanction of Pre approved Housing loans to buy this type of properties.

5. Lack of awareness among General Public : General awareness is required as they can buy the properties at very attractive prices.

More than 27% of total home sales are foreclosed sales in USA, where as it may be less than 1 % in India.

6.Sentiment about buying properties in Bank Auctions: Some of the people with out having any financial control over their expenditure, are not paying the loans and they are losing their properties.
Due to the above reasons Banks and Housing Financial Institutions could not sell around 40 % or above properties and they are laying with them only. To dispose off these properties some Banks are going for re Auction. Some Banks are selling on private treaty, i.e selling the property to anyone who approaches them to buy these properties. Banks are reducing the earlier reserve price also by 5 % to 15 %.

The following advertisement is self explanatory of the above aspects.





Friday, April 6, 2012

Save the rod ... and create a Frankenstein

Like all morals and most hazards, moral hazard is man-made. Only man can reduce it.
Dipankar Choudhury - LiveMint

A close friend, who works for an asset reconstruction company, recently told me after a few drinks: “I suggest that you do a project report and take a Rs.100-200 crore loan. The bank, RBI, government –will all treat you like a king if you default. Don’t borrow just 5 or 10 crore, then you will be in trouble.”
He went on: “If my son wants me to find a match for him, I will look for the daughter of a defaulter. Then his life will be made”. Yes, some entrepreneurs regularly dream of graduating from facing a problem to becoming a problem for the system.

Nearly 20 years ago, Michael Fay, an American student in Singapore, was sentenced to six cane lashes for vandalism, which due to hectic American lobbying was reduced to four and he was let off with that. His partners in crime got more severe punishment. Four years later, Fay was held in the US for possessing drugs.

Wikipedia defines moral hazard as a tendency to take undue risks because the costs are not borne by the party taking the risk. The bothersome part is that it is rife even in developed and developing countries which hold the rule of law in high esteem. Just the perspective differs: in the West, public discourse sees moral hazard largely as excessive risk-taking by overpaid bankers, in India it is repeated defaults encouraged by mollycoddling lenders.

Where genuine accommodation ends and mollycoddling begins is extremely tough to ascertain ex-ante. There have been cases of remarkable borrower resuscitation after one lifeline, and even two. And then there are the perpetual delusions. Most banks do not have this data, or choose not to compile it.

But one thumb rule will always work. Indulgence by a lender makes sense only if the underlying fundamentals of the borrower’s business are sound and he happens to be facing a cyclical problem (this of course is a judgment call but not too difficult to make, e.g. it takes some imagination to contend that airlines are facing a temporary problem and their fundamentals are sound). Else it is mala fide and a potential source of moral hazard.

It is a difficult and unpleasant subject as a result of which not much literature is available. However, in a noteworthy paper titled “Financial Intermediation in India: A Case of Aggravated Moral Hazard?” dated July 2002, Saugata Bhattacharya and Urjit Patel made an attempt to look at this issue very early in the lending growth cycle in India. Many points presented there are still relevant.
The authors identify three reasons for the malaise: large and increasing government role in the financial sector, high regulatory forbearance and absence of efficient bankruptcy procedures. They premise that the resultant moral hazard inhibits effective co-financing and capital formation in the economy.

On the first point, it is important to note that the authors identify government participation in the financial sector and not just government ownership that leads to increasing moral hazard. It includes provision of government guarantees to projects, priority sector lending, mandating write-offs of loans, and so on. In good times, there is little incentive for the government to change the status quo, and in bad times, it feels the need to increase its involvement, at which point prudence takes a back seat.
Regulatory forbearance ensures lenders, especially banks, do not close down. At least for banks there is this argument, though shallow, that faith in them should not erode. Why wholesale lenders like IFCI have to remain in perpetual life support is less understandable. If a lender will most likely never be allowed to fail, depositors will not care to monitor lender performance, managers will be less vigilant and the borrower incentivized to take advantage of the system.

Developments on the bankruptcy procedures front have however been encouraging. The SARFAESI Act (which is India’s foreclosure law) has been quite effective but there is still a long way to go.
Ironically, bankers suggest that it has been used largely as a stick to beat the borrowers with and bring them to the negotiating table, and not for seizing and selling off security, the ostensible purpose for which the law was enacted. Thus the effectiveness is at best sub-optimal. Judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings for debt recovery are still tortuous.

To conclude, I particularly like one sentence which the authors use: “This process of increasingly aggravated moral hazard driving…riskiness of the asset portfolios…is analogous to riding a bicycle without brakes – once on it, if you stop pedaling, you will fall off.” Very similar to what Ramalinga Raju remarked along with his confession of having cooked the books of Satyam for years. Let’s not carry on the comparison further; it looks scary.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Asset Reconstruction Companies - Missing the Good In Bad Loans



Business for ARCs picks up when bad loans mount with banks.  Not in India, where they remain hobbled by fear among banks and policy paralysis,
report Rishi Shah & Dheeraj Tiwari 

 


    The business of asset reconstruction companies, which specialise in settling bad loans of the financial sector, should pick up when an economy feels pain. Yet, even as the Indian economy decelerates to its slowest in three years and bad loans of banks hit an all-time high, ARCs remain in a state of drift, subdued by fear among banks and a loose policy framework. The pace of new bad loans with banks has always exceeded the loans transferred by them to ARCs for disposal. For example, between March 2009 and March 2010, even as bad loans with banks increased by Rs 15,774 crore, transfers to ARCs trailed at Rs 10,675 crore, according to data from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). This differential is likely to increase as, between March 2010 and September 2011, bad loans of banks are up 40%. While exact numbers are not available, anecdotal evidence suggests flows to ARCs is not keeping pace. “There is no business coming our way,” says a senior official with a leading reconstruction company. According to the latest financial report of State Bank of India (SBI), India’s largest bank, it has Rs 40,000 crore of bad loans. Yet, in 2009-10 and 2010-11, it passed on just six bad loans with a combined book value of Rs 40 crore to ARCs. “In a continually rising NPA scenario, even large banks such as SBI and IDBI Bank sell three and two NPAs, respectively, in a year, that too year after year,” adds Rajiv Ranjan, president & CEO of Reliance ARC. “What can you guess about business coming the way of ARCs?” Business is not picking up for two reasons: fear among bank officials and a weak policy framework. 



FEAR OF ACTION


Bank officials are hesitant to sell bad loans. “Banking is dominated by the public sector, which is reluctant to pawn off assets to other management firms as they fear a loss of face,” says the head of a PSU bank, not wanting to be identified. When a loan is transferred, it goes off the bank’s books. But rather than see it as a way to clean the balance sheet, along with a possibility of recovering something from it, many bank officials fear this might be perceived as an admittance of failure to recover the loan. They also fear vigilance inquiries. “The problem in India is that everybody wants to complain,” says MS Verma, chairman of International Asset Reconstruction Company (IARC), an ARC promoted by HDFC Bank and Tata Capital. “Bankers are afraid that even in a fair process, questions might be asked as to why the NPAs had to be sold when recovery was possible.” Typically, every bank has a chief vigilance officer (CVO) looking into such complaints. Beyond the bank’s CVO, if required, even the Chief Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) can take up such inquiries. In fact, when an ED is to be promoted to CMD, CVC clearance is needed, and inquiries over transfers of bad loan to ARCs can lead to delays in appointments. Given all this, not doing anything is seen as a safer option. “In the public sector, usually, there is accountability only for doing, but none for not doing,” says a senior advocate who declined to be named as he represents banks in courts. “For existing bad loans, all he has to do is create a record that he tried to recover it in every possible way.” The numbers of Arcil, India’s largest ARC, bear that out. Arcil has acquired bad loans with a principal value of Rs 24,000 crore. Of this, Rs 9,000 crore came from ICICI Bank, a private bank, which is 50% more than what SBI gave. Both banks, along with PNB and IDBI Bank, are copromoters of Arcil.


WEAK POLICY FRAMEWORK

According to the RBI, as of June 2011, India had 13 operational ARCs, holding assets with a combined book value of about Rs 74,000 crore. But they are not endowed with capital. In developed markets, well-capitalised ARCs buy loans outright. In India, however, ARCs, pay a bank about 5% of the price of the loan agreed on. For the rest, ARCs issue security receipts (SRs), which is a promise to pay the bank a certain share of the sale value at the time of selling the bad loan. When bad loans have been transferred, both banks and ARCs have bickered over the pricediscovery mechanism and the auction process. Indian banks, typically, offer those loans to ARCs they have been unable to realise for five years or more, and so are often mired in legalities. Banks sell bad loans through an auction, for which they fix a base price. Neeta Mukerji of Arcil says the base price fixed by banks is random and has no relation to the asset’s residual value. “An ARC’s estimate of recovery expected, time frame, cost and funding cost is quite different from that of banks,” says Mukerji, officiating CEO of Arcil. Officials of four ARCs that ET spoke to say the process favours banks, with one even labelling the auction “a sham”. “They only want to sell the worthless, age-old NPAs, where they have almost exhausted recovery possibilities," says an official of one of those ARCs, not wanting to be named. "And they want us to pay a substantial price.” Verma of IARC says some banks conduct auctions only to find the “right price” for themselves to further use as a bargaining tool with defaulters. “Then, they go to the borrower and scare him by saying that ARCs will use tougher means and try to settle it for a higher price,” he adds. Another head of a smaller ARC, speaking on the condition of anonymity, says that during due diligence, one bank refuses to show any papers or even the asset to ARC officials, even though some might have legal claims on them. A government panel, with representation from industry, is currently looking at regulatory, legal and accounting issues plaguing ARCs in India. These include a standard format for documentation, ARCs going public to raise more capital and reduction in bottlenecks in the functioning of debt recovery tribunals (DRTs), which is the stage preceding ARCs. A quick resolution will benefit all stakeholders, says a finance ministry official who is part of the panel but did not want to be identified. “Experience suggests that NPAs, like a cube of ice, lose value over time. And rather fast,” he says.


http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=ETNEW&BaseHref=ETM%2F2012%2F03%2F13&ViewMode=GIF&PageLabel=15&EntityId=Ar01501&AppName=1 



   

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Managing NPAs, maintaining NIMs, are immediate priorities: Sri B A Prabhakar,

Interview with CMD, Andhra Bank , Parnika Sokhi / Mumbai Feb 14, 2012, 00:39 IST






B A Prabhakar, who took over as chairman and managing director of Andhra Bank last month, has drawn up his to-do list. He shares his priorities in an interview withParnika Sokhi. Edited Excerpts:


Have you listed the areas needing immediate attention?
My immediate priorities are to concentrate on management of non-performing assets (NPAs) and net interest margins (NIMs). Slippages have gone up because of a few accounts but recoveries have been good. As a result, we have been able to show a net reduction in NPAs this quarter. We recovered about Rs 500 crore in the third quarter. We aim to show better results in the next quarter. Our NIM of 3.8 per cent is in line with our public sector peers. We aim to maintain this level. We want to also focus on branch expansion policy outside Andhra Pradesh.


You said the bank doesn’t aim to lend to micro finance institutions (MFIs) as   of now. Is it on fears that the exposure to the industry could turn bad? 
No, we have a negligible amount of bad loans from that sector, but we have restructured three accounts there. The reason for not going aggressive in that sector is that we would like to have more clarity on the regulation and legal structure there. We can look at expansion in a big way only after we have clarity on those issues. All the accounts restructured from the sector are from Andhra Pradesh. About half the total exposure of Rs 300 crore in MFIs is from that state. So, incremental lending will take place selectively, and preferable outside Andhra.


Which are the target sectors to increase exposure?
We would like to have an even growth in small and medium enterprises, and the retail category. We have not fixed any targets, as such, but these will be two focus areas that will enable us to meet our priority sector commitments. Loans to large corporate bodies form about 50 per cent of our portfolio and whatever credit growth we are targeting has to also come from that segment.


What are your plans to boost fee income?
That is one area we’ll have to work on. We are planning to take up third-party product distribution in a big way. That is where the focus on retail comes in. But we will also focus on increasing the retail liabilities and assets.


Your growth targets for advances and deposits?
We are planning to achieve credit growth of about 16 per cent and deposit growth of about 18 per cent by the end of this financial year.
We will wait for guidance on monetary aggregates from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) before drawing up plans for the next financial year. That will give us some idea on the potential growth in the coming year.


Any thoughts on revising the interest rates on loans and deposits?
We’d like to wait for RBI’s next policy announcement.


Your hiring plans for the next financial year?
We are planning to hire about 1,450 clerks and 800 officers to take care of next year’s branch expansion and also to take care of the attrition in the bank. We plan to add at least 150 branches next year.


Banking on staff for recovery


Lenders are dedicating full-fledged teams to curtail the threat of rising defaults.
Parnika Sokhi & Abhijit Lele / Mumbai Feb 15, 2012, 00:02 IST




Every day, between 7.30 pm and 11 pm, a top official of a public sector bank gets text messages from 46 zonal managers. The messages contain details on recovery figures of respective zones, with additional information on ranking of centres, based on recoveries.

The zonal managers have to send these numbers daily. Failure to do so will see an email from the chairman’s office seeking the details. The official says he has been doing this chore daily for the last one year. This helps keep a tab on the accounts which have slipped into the non-performing asset (NPA) category.

This is not a one-off incident. Banks reeling under asset quality pressure have beefed up recovery efforts. And, it has percolated to the ground level. Branch level staff are also being deployed for collection of dues.

“We have a recovery team of about 200 employees. Of this, a majority were redeployed from other departments in the third quarter,” said B A Prabhakar, chairman and managing director of Andhra Bank. The bank is targeting a recovery of at least Rs 500 crore this quarter through its in-house team.

The last two quarters of a financial year have always seen a flurry of activity for credit deployment. However, the situation is different this year. With the slackening of credit demand due to high interest rates, hectic activity is being seen on meeting recovery targets.

Lenders are also resorting to referring bad accounts backed with securities to Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests (SARFAESI) processes.

Nupur Mitra, chairperson and managing director at Dena Bank, said the bank was using SARFAESI and one-time settlements in a big way. “We are also holding massive lok adalats for small accounts,” said Mitra. The bank has deployed clerical staff and nodal officers to do the task.

In rural areas, some banks are asking customers, while extending fresh loans, to at least pay the minimum interest to avoid the loan slipping into the non-performing category.

Bankers say since asset quality pressure is more in the agriculture and small and medium enterprises (SME) segments, maximum recovery efforts are given in these two categories.

State Bank of India (SBI), the country’s largest lender, which had gross NPAs of Rs 40,000 crore at the end of December, has seen 19 per cent of its bad loans in the farm sector and 28.7 per cent in the SME sector. SBI’s cash recovery and upgradation in the December quarter was about Rs 2,000 crore, compared to Rs 1,430 crore in the year-ago period.

The thrust on recovery also comes at a time when not much activity is seen in the stressed asset sale market, after RBI issued guidelines in October 2007, stating banks while selling NPAs, have to work out the net present value of the estimated cash flow associated with the realisable value of the available securities net of the cost of realisation. The sale price, generally, should not be lower than the net present value.

“We were able to recover 100 per cent of principle in accounts, where the offer from asset reconstruction companies was at 30 per cent,” said Sounadra Kumar, deputy managing director, SBI. “Given this experience, the preference is for in-house effort than sale of bad loans,” she added.


Thursday, November 24, 2011

Query Corner: Banking & Finance

- Economic Times

Auto Debit

Can a bank auto debit money from your savings account towards dues of credit card without sending notice to customer?-SATNAM HUNDAL

Bankers have a right of lien and set-off. Set-off means the bank can adjust the credit balance in a customer's account against a debit balance in another account of the customer. The deposit and loan should be due and lawful (law of limitation does not apply). There is no need to send any notice. In fact, the banker must have sent notice when the account was in default.

Friday, October 28, 2011

RBI gets tough on prepayment penalty, discriminatory rates

George Mathew
Posted: Thu Oct 27 2011, 00:44 hrs Mumbai  

After waiting and watching for quite some time, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has finally decided to get tough against the discriminatory pricing of loans and the huge prepayment penalty — up to 2 per cent of the outstanding loans — being charged by some banks. 


The RBI has decided to set up a Working Group to look into principles governing proper, transparent and non-discriminatory pricing of credit. This panel is expected to look into different rates for old and new loan customers. Banks and housing finance firms charge different rates for their old and new loan customers. While old customers usually get the stick of high rates, new customers are wooed with carrots like waivers of charges, lower rates and other incentives. The fleecing of customers in the form of penalty on foreclosure or prepayment of loans and different interest rates for old and new loans has been going on for quite some time. 


Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Prepayment penalty on home loans on way out, RBI indicates

Borrowers wanting to prepay home loans can look forward to some relief as RBI today indicated that it would scrap prepayment penalties charged by banks.

"It is proposed to implement the recommendations of the Damodaran Committee, on which a broad consensus has emerged, as also the action points which were identified by the IBA (Indian Banks' Association) and BCSBI (Banking Codes and Standards Board of India) in the last Banking Ombudsmen conference," RBI said in its mid-year credit policy review.

The Banking Ombudsmen at their conference in September recommended abolition of pre-payment charges on home loans taken under floating rates by customers.

Banks may also offer long-term fixed rate housing loans to customers, Ombudsmen had suggested. They also said lenders may address their asset liability mismatch (ALM) issues by taking recourse to interest rate swaps (IRS) market.

Floating rate loans pass on the interest rate risk from banks, which are much better placed to manage it, to borrowers and, thus, banks only substitute interest rate risk with potential credit risk, the Ombudsmen noted.
Damodaran Committee which was set up by the RBI suggest improvement in banking services had also suggested removal of pre-payment charges.

Some of the private sector lenders charge up to 2 per cent of outstanding loan on foreclosure.
Public sector banks by and large do not levy any prepayment charges when the amount is paid by borrowers from their own sources.

The National Housing Bank (NHB) has already directed all housing finance companies to desist from imposing a prepayment penalty on home loan borrowers.

Foreclosure Homes Account for 28 Percent of Q1 2011 Sales

May 25, 2011
By RealtyTrac Staff


Average REO Discount 35 Percent; Foreclosure Discount Drops to 9 Percent
Average Time to Sell at 176 Days for REOs; 228 Days for Pre-Foreclosures
IRVINE, Calif. – May 26, 2011 — RealtyTrac® (http://www.realtytrac.com/gateway_co.asp?accnt=137300), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its Q1 2011 U.S. Foreclosure Sales Report™, which shows that sales of bank-owned homes and those in some stage of foreclosure accounted for 28 percent of all U.S. residential sales in the first quarter of 2011, up slightly from 27 percent of all sales in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the highest percentage of sales since the first quarter of 2010, when 29 percent of all sales were foreclosure sales.
The average sales price of properties in some stage of foreclosure — default, scheduled for auction or bank-owned (REO) — was $168,321, down 1.89 percent from the fourth quarter of 2010 and down 1.46 percent from the first quarter of 2010.

Monday, October 24, 2011

For banks, recovery of bad loans remains a challenge

T. S. Krishnamurthy

Debt Recovery Tribunals, BIFR have not served their cause well


The downgrading of State Bank of India (SBI) by credit rating agency Moody's and the consequent turmoil in the stock market is a much-talked-about issue currently.

The downgrading is mainly due to SBI's Tier-1 capital adequacy ratio coming down to 7.6 per cent against the norm of 8 per cent.

This is a direct consequence of the increase in gross non-performing assets (NPAs) to 3.52 per cent and the consequent higher provisions to be made.

Though the case of SBI is the talking point now, the rise in NPAs is a phenomenon afflicting all banks.
In an earlier article ( Business Line, September 4, 2011), the broad reasons for the spurt in NPAs and the difficulties faced by banks in recovering bad loans through the SARFRAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) Act were highlighted.

Relief for home loan borrowers



The National Housing Bank has asked housing finance companies to refrain from levy of penalty on preclosure of floating rate loans.

For those millions of home loan borrowers who were sulking at their decision to go for floating rate of interest, and who found their own interest rates being regularly reset even as new borrowers were being assiduously besought with lower rates, the order from the National Housing Bank that regulates Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) on treating both sets of borrowers equally should have come as a surprise.
The National Housing Bank, in a major relief to home loan customers, also asked the HFCs to refrain from levy of penalty on preclosure of floating rate loans, even if this was made from borrowed money (generally a euphemism for fresh loans at lower interest rates from a rival lender).

While the decisions have been welcomed by the real estate industry and the borrowers, the HFCs aren't really pleased.

In an interview to Business Line, Mr Srinivas Acharya, Managing Director, Sundaram BNP Paribas Home Finance Ltd, Chennai, expressed the fear that ‘home loans would be operated as demand loans with frequent shifts of home loans'. He argued that ‘there is a certain degree of unfairness' in that, while there are restrictions on charging a foreclosure premium on the asset side for HFCs; these will continue to pay premiums on foreclosures on the liability side.

FORECLOSURES

Currently, the HFCs see foreclosures to the extent of 10 per cent of the portfolio in a year. Already, foreclosure of home loans from own savings is exempted from penalty. Therefore, he didn't see much additional impact beyond, say, 0.075 per cent of the portfolio. While he didn't see this as a major source of income, this penalty always served as a ‘deterrent against poaching of customers'. As regards interest rate equalisation between old and new customers, he said this wasn't a major problem and will get settled with time. The real issue was there was no similar condition on lenders to HFCs!

On being asked if he feared there would be a shift from HFCs to banks because of this order since the National Housing Bank order would apply only to HFCs, Mr Acharya didn't view this ‘as a threat'. HFCs primarily thrive on their quick ‘turn-around time' and better understanding of the business and customer service. Some movement may be there, but that would only be an immediate reaction in the short term, he felt.

As to HFCs raising the interest rates for new borrowers so as to mitigate the impact of the order, he said the ‘interest rates would be guided more by ‘demand-supply' factor and the impact wouldn't be serious for HFCs who have borrowed on variable rate terms.

He felt that while there may be some rush for refinancing of higher cost home loans with cheaper loans, this would settle down. More than the bigger players in the industry, the smaller players are niche players and therefore won't be affected. As a result, his own company may not be impacted by more than Rs 3-4 crore this year. This wasn't a major component of its overall income and he said that ‘a HFC should thrive on continuity of a good customer rather than short-term gain from foreclosure premiums!'

Mr Acharya argued that this was ‘more a populist kind of measure', as home loans attract a lot of attention and touch the retail end of customers. Even the Competition Commission of India (CCI) had upheld the appropriateness of foreclosure premium. While conceding that there might be some fringe players charging premiums at exorbitant rates, that really may not be the case in his own company. Moreover such players charging premium at exorbitant rates could be controlled.

PREMIUM

He felt that there could ‘be a mandated rate of premium' rather than removing it altogether. Removal of foreclosure premium, if at all, should have been done across the financial sector, both for lending and borrowing, and not just for HFCs alone.

Mr. Acharya also felt it would be far more prudent ‘to chase a known customer with proven repayment record rather than go after a new home loan customer with all the uncertainties!', he added.
In an impact analysis of National Housing Bank's decision, IDFC Securities said that the regulatory arbitrage between banks & HFCs wasn't ‘likely to sustain'. At present, these norms apply only to HFCs, and not banks. RBI had earlier suggested, but not mandated, these terms for banks. However, it expected RBI also to follow suit.

Referring to the practice of financiers offering a lower rate for new home loans (for old borrowers) to attract business, it felt that the financiers would have to increase the interest rates for new loans more (by 100-150 bp). However, they could establish a credit profile of customers to mitigate the impact, offering some flexibility in pricing.

IDFC Securities expected new home loan rates to rise from the current levels and settle somewhere between the prevailing new and old home loan rates. With the cost of a new home loan rising, the growth in new home sales and mortgage portfolios would suffer.

Waiver of prepayment charges constitutes a very small part of financiers' income. But waiver increased borrowers' ability to refinance their existing loans. This could place players with a stronger liability franchise in an advantageous position vis-à-vis less competitive players, it concluded.
Mr. S. S. Asokan, Executive Director, Shriram Properties Ltd, Bangalore, said that at a time of rising interest rates, this will greatly help the borrowers and facilitate greater housing loan disbursals by the HFCs.

Foreclosure Activity Hits Record High in Third Quarter


IRVINE, Calif. – Oct. 15, 2009 — RealtyTrac® (www.realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™ for Q3 2009, which shows that foreclosure filings — default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 937,840 properties in the third quarter, a 5 percent increase from the previous quarter and an increase of nearly 23 percent from Q3 2008. One in every 136 U.S. housing units received a foreclosure filing during the quarter — the highest quarterly foreclosure rate since RealtyTrac began issuing its report in the first quarter of 2005.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 343,638 properties in September, a 4 percent decrease from the previous month but a 29 percent increase from September 2008. Despite the monthly decrease, September’s total was still the third highest monthly total since the RealtyTrac report began in January 2005, behind only July and August of this year.

“Bank repossessions, or REOs, jumped 21 percent from the second quarter to the third quarter, corresponding to jumps in defaults and scheduled auctions in the previous two quarters,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “REO activity increased from the previous quarter in all but two states and the District of Columbia, indicating that lenders may be starting to work through some of the pent-up foreclosure inventory caused by legislative delays, loan modification efforts and high volumes of distressed properties.”

Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the total number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported during the month or quarter — broken out by type of filing at the state and national level. Data is also available at the individual county level for both Q1 2009 and March 2009. Data is collected from more than 2,200 counties nationwide, and those counties account for more than 90 percent of the U.S. population. RealtyTrac’s report incorporates documents filed in all three phases of foreclosure: Default — Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS); Auction — Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more than one foreclosure document is filed against a property during the month or quarter, only the most recent filing is counted in the report.

U.S. Foreclosure Market Data by State – Q3 2009
(NOTE: Click on a column heading to sort)
Rate Rank State Name NOD LIS NTS NFS REO Total ▴ 1/every X HH (rate) %Change from Q2 09 %Change from Q3 08
--
United States
153,255
188,986
263,957
94,590
237,052
937,840
136
5.40
22.50
3
California
111,741
1
87,377
0
50,935
250,054
53
-1.52
18.60
4
Florida
1
95,790
1
39,403
21,729
156,924
56
-0.71
23.27
2
Arizona
20
0
36,176
0
14,146
50,342
53
5.07
24.55
1
Nevada
19,949
0
16,329
0
11,647
47,925
23
9.68
58.88
10
Illinois
0
18,585
1
8,980
9,704
37,270
141
13.68
30.29
8
Michigan
11,454
0
10,575
0
14,997
37,026
122
9.50**
22.31**
7
Georgia
53
1
22,088
0
11,243
33,385
119
6.69
25.06
28
Texas
86
4
17,256
0
12,492
29,838
316
11.27
8.72
13
Ohio
0
12,137
0
8,707
8,801
29,645
171
-4.73
-11.71
15
New Jersey
0
11,816
0
3,878
2,414
18,108
193
44.59
1.20
16
Virginia
51
1
10,136
0
6,499
16,687
196
8.24
4.14†
9
Colorado
41
0
11,437
0
4,787
16,265
131
11.43
12.53
39
New York
0
11,048
1
2,316
1,877
15,242
521
11.55
5.28
12
Maryland
3
6,795
0
5,795
2,210
14,803
157
58.83
85.64
34
Pennsylvania
1
4,961
0
5,232
3,973
14,167
387
7.16
15.48
17
Mass.
1
7,779
0
3,159
1,728
12,667
215
17.53
34.81
20
Indiana
0
2,362
0
4,504
5,235
12,101
230
-12.75
-15.77
19
Wisconsin
1
5,899
0
2,661
2,620
11,181
229
11.17
105.16
22
Tennessee
4
1
4,730
0
6,153
10,888
250
3.92
-9.09††
18
Minnesota
31
0
5,450
0
5,139
10,620
217
16.27
100.26
23
Washington
0
0
6,142
0
4,233
10,375
264
-7.32
33.00
11
Oregon
108
2
7,033
0
3,175
10,318
156
7.09
76.59
36
North Carolina
1,028
4
4,158
0
4,628
9,818
420
28.86
-5.99
6
Utah
3,515
0
3,564
0
2,474
9,553
97
13.24
96.28
30
Missouri
24
0
4,470
0
3,398
7,892
335
8.26
-11.17†
24
South Carolina
1
3,695
1
1,153
2,696
7,546
268
10.99
59.74
5
Idaho
2,916
0
3,021
0
594
6,531
97
28.06
153.53*
32
Alabama
8
0
3,808
0
2,135
5,951
359
-7.07
173.86*
21
Arkansas
339
0
3,002
0
1,837
5,178
249
11.59
39.61*
25
Connecticut
0
3,422
0
408
1,283
5,113
281
68.86
10.00
29
Oklahoma
744
843
396
1,980
1,069
5,032
323
64.66*
22.02*
37
Louisiana
0
762
0
2,092
1,132
3,986
466
21.30*
98.70*
31
Kansas
0
538
0
1,129
1,735
3,402
358
39.71
47.08
41
Kentucky
1
1,050
0
1,126
1,102
3,279
581
15.30
12.45
14
Hawaii
449
0
1,499
0
795
2,743
185
29.02
141.46
40
Mississippi
4
1
841
0
1,374
2,220
565
50.51*
241.01*
35
New Mexico
0
890
0
837
456
2,183
395
9.20
84.69*
43
Iowa
1
0
658
0
1,292
1,951
681
17.81
31.91*
27
New Hampshire
14
0
1,372
0
558
1,944
306
-5.08
-2.21
26
Rhode Island
1
0
871
0
682
1,554
290
-6.33
-2.75

District of Columbia
405
0
619
0
159
1,183
240
19.37
-11.05
42
Maine
0
234
0
577
242
1,053
662
27.02
33.12
38
Delaware
0
4
0
483
291
778
500
-8.79
-11.69
33
Alaska
9
0
534
0
221
764
369
29.93
36.43
45
Nebraska
241
247
12
6
229
735
1,062
75.84*
-29.67
48
West Virginia
6
0
287
0
277
570
1,549
67.16*
356.00*
44
South Dakota
0
110
0
105
149
364
981
127.50
205.88
47
Montana
1
0
19
0
273
293
1,486
94.04
-6.69
46
Wyoming
1
0
86
0
130
217
1,117
-4.82
-14.90
49
North Dakota
0
3
0
59
52
114
2,724
29.55
-20.28
50
Vermont
2
1
7
0
52
62
5,023
342.86
169.57
*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or improvements
**Collection of records classified as NOD began in August 2009 because of change in state law
Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state was discontinued starting in January 2009
†† Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state was discontinued starting in September 2008