Showing posts with label International. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International. Show all posts

Sunday, December 25, 2011

Shorts surge on ICICI Bank on bad loan fears

Nihar Gokhale, ET Bureau Dec 14, 2011, 01.29am IST

MUMBAI: Traders mounted their bearish bets on ICICI Bank on Tuesday, taking cues from the plunge in its American Depository Receipt (ADR) the previous night, as they speculated that the private lender's bad loans may increase with the Indian economy weakening.

Short positions in ICICI Bank stock futures surged after the five-year credit-default swaps (CDS) on the lender rose 88 basis points to 483 points in a week--one of the fastest increases among Asian banks.

ICICI December stock futures, which closed at Rs 708 against the share price of Rs 709.30, added around 4,500 contracts in open interest. While the contract was trading at a premium of almost Rs 4 for most of the day, it slipped into a discount of Rs 1 at close. ICICI Bank shares hit a 52-week low of Rs 690.25 earlier in the day.

"It is the largest private sector bank and when sectors like power, infrastructure and aviation are stressed, it is bound to increase worries about asset quality," said Saday Sinha, analyst at Kotak Securities.

ICICI Bank's CDS —the cost of insuring debt of the lender against non-payment— is still 13 points away from the record level of 496 on October 10. The country's largest lender State Bank of India's CDS, which has risen 43 basis points to almost 370 points, is about 26 points away from the high of 396 in October.
Analysts said the sudden pessimism about ICICI Bank has resulted in traders incurring losses in a trading strategy involving SBI. Many derivatives traders have been selling SBI contracts and buying ICICI Bank contracts, as part of a pairtrade strategy. They expected SBI to outperform ICICI Bank.

"There have been renewed concerns over ICICI Bank, and this is unlike a few weeks ago when it was trading at comfortable levels. Its correlation with SBI futures has been disturbed," said a derivatives head of a Mumbai-based institutional brokerage, who declined to be named.
A recent study by IDBI Capital Market shows the estimated Corporate Debt Restructuring (CDR) referrals of ICICI Bank in the second quarter of 2011-12 was Rs 1,170 crore.
The percentage of ICICI's estimated CDR referrals to its cumulative restructured book was at 46.9% in the quarter, the brokerage said. In comparison, this ratio was 2.5% for SBI, with its estimated CDR referrals at Rs 900 crore.

The percentage of ICICI's estimated CDR referrals to its cumulative restructured book was at 46.9% in the quarter, the brokerage said. In comparison, this ratio was 2.5% for SBI, with its estimated CDR referrals at Rs 900 crore.
/photo.cms?msid=11100142

"Our estimated Q2FY12 CDR referral as a percentage of cumulative restructured assets for some of the banks is quite high. This estimated CDR amount is likely to have been referred in Q2FY12, so banks are staring at atleast this amount for conversion to either restructured assets or NPAs in coming quarters," said Sandeep Jain, analyst at IDBI Capital, in a client note.

Some analysts are less worried about the likelihood of the surge in bad debts of Indian banks. "There are asset quality issues and if people are worried about it, then it is rightly so. But, we are of the view that Indian banks, and especially ICICI, will manage these asset issues well.

 Here, the question is whether there will be earnings growth or not," said Rajat Rajgarhia, head – institutional research at Motilal Oswal Financial.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Foreclosure Homes Account for 28 Percent of Q1 2011 Sales

May 25, 2011
By RealtyTrac Staff


Average REO Discount 35 Percent; Foreclosure Discount Drops to 9 Percent
Average Time to Sell at 176 Days for REOs; 228 Days for Pre-Foreclosures
IRVINE, Calif. – May 26, 2011 — RealtyTrac® (http://www.realtytrac.com/gateway_co.asp?accnt=137300), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its Q1 2011 U.S. Foreclosure Sales Report™, which shows that sales of bank-owned homes and those in some stage of foreclosure accounted for 28 percent of all U.S. residential sales in the first quarter of 2011, up slightly from 27 percent of all sales in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the highest percentage of sales since the first quarter of 2010, when 29 percent of all sales were foreclosure sales.
The average sales price of properties in some stage of foreclosure — default, scheduled for auction or bank-owned (REO) — was $168,321, down 1.89 percent from the fourth quarter of 2010 and down 1.46 percent from the first quarter of 2010.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Foreclosure Activity Hits Record High in Third Quarter


IRVINE, Calif. – Oct. 15, 2009 — RealtyTrac® (www.realtytrac.com), the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™ for Q3 2009, which shows that foreclosure filings — default notices, scheduled auctions and bank repossessions — were reported on 937,840 properties in the third quarter, a 5 percent increase from the previous quarter and an increase of nearly 23 percent from Q3 2008. One in every 136 U.S. housing units received a foreclosure filing during the quarter — the highest quarterly foreclosure rate since RealtyTrac began issuing its report in the first quarter of 2005.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 343,638 properties in September, a 4 percent decrease from the previous month but a 29 percent increase from September 2008. Despite the monthly decrease, September’s total was still the third highest monthly total since the RealtyTrac report began in January 2005, behind only July and August of this year.

“Bank repossessions, or REOs, jumped 21 percent from the second quarter to the third quarter, corresponding to jumps in defaults and scheduled auctions in the previous two quarters,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “REO activity increased from the previous quarter in all but two states and the District of Columbia, indicating that lenders may be starting to work through some of the pent-up foreclosure inventory caused by legislative delays, loan modification efforts and high volumes of distressed properties.”

Report methodology
The RealtyTrac U.S. Foreclosure Market Report provides a count of the total number of properties with at least one foreclosure filing reported during the month or quarter — broken out by type of filing at the state and national level. Data is also available at the individual county level for both Q1 2009 and March 2009. Data is collected from more than 2,200 counties nationwide, and those counties account for more than 90 percent of the U.S. population. RealtyTrac’s report incorporates documents filed in all three phases of foreclosure: Default — Notice of Default (NOD) and Lis Pendens (LIS); Auction — Notice of Trustee Sale and Notice of Foreclosure Sale (NTS and NFS); and Real Estate Owned, or REO properties (that have been foreclosed on and repurchased by a bank). If more than one foreclosure document is filed against a property during the month or quarter, only the most recent filing is counted in the report.

U.S. Foreclosure Market Data by State – Q3 2009
(NOTE: Click on a column heading to sort)
Rate Rank State Name NOD LIS NTS NFS REO Total ▴ 1/every X HH (rate) %Change from Q2 09 %Change from Q3 08
--
United States
153,255
188,986
263,957
94,590
237,052
937,840
136
5.40
22.50
3
California
111,741
1
87,377
0
50,935
250,054
53
-1.52
18.60
4
Florida
1
95,790
1
39,403
21,729
156,924
56
-0.71
23.27
2
Arizona
20
0
36,176
0
14,146
50,342
53
5.07
24.55
1
Nevada
19,949
0
16,329
0
11,647
47,925
23
9.68
58.88
10
Illinois
0
18,585
1
8,980
9,704
37,270
141
13.68
30.29
8
Michigan
11,454
0
10,575
0
14,997
37,026
122
9.50**
22.31**
7
Georgia
53
1
22,088
0
11,243
33,385
119
6.69
25.06
28
Texas
86
4
17,256
0
12,492
29,838
316
11.27
8.72
13
Ohio
0
12,137
0
8,707
8,801
29,645
171
-4.73
-11.71
15
New Jersey
0
11,816
0
3,878
2,414
18,108
193
44.59
1.20
16
Virginia
51
1
10,136
0
6,499
16,687
196
8.24
4.14†
9
Colorado
41
0
11,437
0
4,787
16,265
131
11.43
12.53
39
New York
0
11,048
1
2,316
1,877
15,242
521
11.55
5.28
12
Maryland
3
6,795
0
5,795
2,210
14,803
157
58.83
85.64
34
Pennsylvania
1
4,961
0
5,232
3,973
14,167
387
7.16
15.48
17
Mass.
1
7,779
0
3,159
1,728
12,667
215
17.53
34.81
20
Indiana
0
2,362
0
4,504
5,235
12,101
230
-12.75
-15.77
19
Wisconsin
1
5,899
0
2,661
2,620
11,181
229
11.17
105.16
22
Tennessee
4
1
4,730
0
6,153
10,888
250
3.92
-9.09††
18
Minnesota
31
0
5,450
0
5,139
10,620
217
16.27
100.26
23
Washington
0
0
6,142
0
4,233
10,375
264
-7.32
33.00
11
Oregon
108
2
7,033
0
3,175
10,318
156
7.09
76.59
36
North Carolina
1,028
4
4,158
0
4,628
9,818
420
28.86
-5.99
6
Utah
3,515
0
3,564
0
2,474
9,553
97
13.24
96.28
30
Missouri
24
0
4,470
0
3,398
7,892
335
8.26
-11.17†
24
South Carolina
1
3,695
1
1,153
2,696
7,546
268
10.99
59.74
5
Idaho
2,916
0
3,021
0
594
6,531
97
28.06
153.53*
32
Alabama
8
0
3,808
0
2,135
5,951
359
-7.07
173.86*
21
Arkansas
339
0
3,002
0
1,837
5,178
249
11.59
39.61*
25
Connecticut
0
3,422
0
408
1,283
5,113
281
68.86
10.00
29
Oklahoma
744
843
396
1,980
1,069
5,032
323
64.66*
22.02*
37
Louisiana
0
762
0
2,092
1,132
3,986
466
21.30*
98.70*
31
Kansas
0
538
0
1,129
1,735
3,402
358
39.71
47.08
41
Kentucky
1
1,050
0
1,126
1,102
3,279
581
15.30
12.45
14
Hawaii
449
0
1,499
0
795
2,743
185
29.02
141.46
40
Mississippi
4
1
841
0
1,374
2,220
565
50.51*
241.01*
35
New Mexico
0
890
0
837
456
2,183
395
9.20
84.69*
43
Iowa
1
0
658
0
1,292
1,951
681
17.81
31.91*
27
New Hampshire
14
0
1,372
0
558
1,944
306
-5.08
-2.21
26
Rhode Island
1
0
871
0
682
1,554
290
-6.33
-2.75

District of Columbia
405
0
619
0
159
1,183
240
19.37
-11.05
42
Maine
0
234
0
577
242
1,053
662
27.02
33.12
38
Delaware
0
4
0
483
291
778
500
-8.79
-11.69
33
Alaska
9
0
534
0
221
764
369
29.93
36.43
45
Nebraska
241
247
12
6
229
735
1,062
75.84*
-29.67
48
West Virginia
6
0
287
0
277
570
1,549
67.16*
356.00*
44
South Dakota
0
110
0
105
149
364
981
127.50
205.88
47
Montana
1
0
19
0
273
293
1,486
94.04
-6.69
46
Wyoming
1
0
86
0
130
217
1,117
-4.82
-14.90
49
North Dakota
0
3
0
59
52
114
2,724
29.55
-20.28
50
Vermont
2
1
7
0
52
62
5,023
342.86
169.57
*Actual increase may not be as high due to data collection changes or improvements
**Collection of records classified as NOD began in August 2009 because of change in state law
Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state was discontinued starting in January 2009
†† Collection of some records previously classified as NOD in this state was discontinued starting in September 2008

Monday, October 10, 2011

Moody's downgrade of SBI triggers bond price correction

Bonds prices corrected on the back of bank and fund buying as traders weighted the possibility of a pause in policy rate hikes by the Re serve Bank of India.

The purchases took up the price of the 10-year 7.8 per cent coupon security due in 2021 to Rs 95.48 (par value Rs 100) or a yield of 8.50 per cent.

Intra-week, the security had hit a low of 8.55 per cent (Rs 95.18). Traders said the re covery was prompted largely by provident funds purchas es. Although provident fund elevated bonds, yields were still at six basis points off the previous week's 8.44 per cent (Rs 95.86).

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Demand for distressed property rises dramatically


Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Published by MILLIE DYSON - myintroducer.com

Worldwide demand for distressed property increased dramatically in Q2 2011, finds this quarter's RICS Global Distressed Property Monitor.
Over 80 percent of the countries surveyed reported heightened levels of interest from specialist funds in Q2 with three-quarters of these reporting even greater levels of demand than last quarter.

Indeed, in over half of the countries covered, the net balance figure for Q2 demand for distressed property outstrips the comparative number for Q3 expected supply, most noticeably in Japan, China, Singapore and Hong Kong.

Investor demand rose most dramatically in Japan and Hungary this quarter, where net balance scores moved from +6 to +68 and +3 to +64 quarter over quarter, respectively.

In Italy, Poland and Russia agents reported noticeable shifts in sentiment with demand swinging from negative into positive territory.

The survey does, however, suggest that the supply of distressed property continues to outstrip demand in some countries, most noticeably in the Republic of Ireland, Italy and the UK.

Issued today (24 August, 2011) the RICS Global Distressed Property Monitor is a quarterly report that reveals trends in 25 commercial property markets across the globe. A distressed property is defined as a property that is under a foreclosure order or is advertised for sale by its mortgagee.

Distressed property usually fetches a price that is below its market value. An increased rate of distressed properties entering a country's market can be seen as a negative economic indicator while a decrease may signal recovery.

Rise in supply of distressed property set to continue

Property professionals in the majority of countries surveyed expect the level of available distressed property to rise in Q3 2011. Not surprisingly, the Republic of Ireland, Spain and Italy have the highest readings for the levels of foreclosure, while Brazil, Malaysia and Russia have the lowest.

Interestingly, agents in South Africa report a dramatic shift in sentiment and now expect a substantial rise in distressed property for Q3, in contrast to the negative net balance score posted in Q1 2011.

Commenting on the survey RICS Chief Economist Simon Rubinsohn said:

"It is interesting to see agents reporting such a dramatic rise in investor appetite for distressed assets, quarter over quarter.

"To some extent, this may be seen as an encouraging development reflecting a measure of confidence in the outlook for the real estate sector despite the softer tone to the macro news flow.

"However, it needs to be borne in mind that the results are very country specific with generally negative numbers coming from those markets where the economic pain is most intense."

World regional Highlights

UK

The expected supply of distressed property in Q3 looks set to far outweigh investor demand as supply continues to increase (at an even faster rate) and investor demand contracted slightly this quarter.

"This is despite the Bank of England's stance on keeping interest rates at just 0.5 percent.

"The current uncertainty regarding the economic picture should mean the Monetary Policy Committee continues to sit on the policy sidelines for some time to come giving some breathing space for the property sector.

Brazil

Investor demand fell in Brazil this quarter, from a net balance of 0 in Q1 to one of -23. Looking ahead, agents expect the supply of distressed property to fall dramatically in the coming quarter as well, in contrast to last quarter's expectations for increased listings.

That said, the real estate market still remains firm with capital values generally thought likely to rise further over the coming months.

China

Levels of distressed property coming to market in China are still expected to decline in Q3 2011, although somewhat less so than the previous quarter, with net balance scores moving from -34 to -20.

Levels of demand by specialist funds, while still positive, also moderated in Q2. Looking ahead, however, demand for distressed property is still expected to far outstrip supply in this country which is consistent with the projection for further price gains in the commercial market.

France

Property professionals in France expect to see distressed property coming to market at a faster rate in Q3 than in previous quarters.

This, in conjunction with the fact that, according to the survey, investor demand continues to rise at a broadly steady pace suggests that supply will likely outstrip demand in the coming quarter.

Germany

Respondents in Germany registered only a small rise in the pace of investor demand this quarter.

However, agents still expect the supply of distressed property coming to market to increase next quarter albeit at a slower pace than previously as the net balance eased from +24 in Q1 to +15 for Q2.

The net balance reading suggests that demand from specialist funds will outstrip expected supply of distressed property in the coming quarter.

India

According to the survey, demand for foreclosed property in India looks set to surpass expected levels of supply in Q3 with demand from specialist funds appearing to rise dramatically in Q2 (the net balance climbed from +23 to +51, quarter over quarter). Meanwhile, the pace of supply is anticipated to rise only slightly.

Russia

Property professionals in Russia anticipate a continued decline in the level of distressed property for Q3, albeit at a slower pace than in seen previously.

In contrast, agents report a full-scale positive swing in investor demand as net balance scores moved from -11 in Q1 to +17 in Q2. It therefore looks likely that distressed property prices in this country will stabilise over the course of the coming quarter.

Iberia

Spain witnessed a rather strong surge in investor demand this quarter, moving from a Q1 net balance score of +24 to +56. Portugal saw an even stronger surge in the rate of demand, however, as net balance scores moved from +4 in Q1 to +53.

Both Spain and Portugal are in the top five in terms of expected levels of distressed property supply for Q3 2011, however, with net balance scores of +70 and +60, respectively.

Not surprisingly, therefore, property professionals in both countries report that expected Q3 supply will outstrip current levels of demand by specialist funds, which could add to the existing downward pressure on prices.