Watch out for any unpaid dues, taxes and society bills the previous owner could have defaulted on
Yogini Joglekar | Mumbai April 21, 2013 Last Updated at 21:27 IST
Shashi Nair, a Mumbai-based advocate, bought two houses in Chembur and Vasai in 2005 and 2010, respectively, through two different bank auctions. Nair purchased these properties from banks that opted to take recourse under Section 101 and the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) Act.
The most common Acts under which banks take recourse are the DRT, state-specific Co-operative Housing Societies Act, and the Sarfaesi (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) Act.
The Sarfaesi Act, 2002, allows banks and financial institutions to auction properties (residential and commercial) when borrowers fail to repay their loans.
It helps banks reduce their non-performing assets (NPAs) by adopting such measures for recovery.
According to NPAsource.com, the net NPAs of 40 listed banks rose to Rs 92,398 crore in December 2012 from Rs 61,558 crore in March 2012. There were about 23,000 registered properties for auction, worth Rs 21,000 crore. Of these, 8,548 residential flats and 1,846 commercial properties are up for auction.
Ram Sangapure, general manager at Central Bank, says, "Most banks today recover their NPAs under the Sarfaesi Act, as it is faster, hassle-free, and empowers banks to do so without the intervention of the court."
Sanjay Dutt, executive managing director, South Asia, Cushman & Wakefield, says, "Usually, houses bought under the Sarfaesi Act are up to 15-30 per cent cheaper than the prevailing rates of homes in that area. This is because demand for such homes is low, as very few people know about this channel and also banks don't stress on a high price as long as they can recover their losses." Buying through this channel saved Nair as much as Rs 8-10 lakh than the prevailing rates in those areas. Valuations of bank-auctioned homes tend to be on the conservative side, as it is a distress sale.
Properties under Sarfaesi Act
If the borrower defaults on repayment of his/her home loan for six continuous months, banks give the borrower a 60-day period notice to regularise his repayments. If the borrower fails to do so, banks will issue another 30-day period notice. If the borrower doesn't pay even in this period, his or her loan would be declared an NPA. This is when banks will auction his mortgaged property to recover their loan.
Bank issues notice about possession
If the borrower still fails to repay the loan, the bank will take possession of the property that has been kept as mortgage or collateral. The bank can take the help of the police in case the borrower doesn't part with his property. After the property is under its possession, the bank will issue a notice in newspapers. This is when potential buyers should prepare themselves and wait for bank's auction-notice.
Wait for the auction-notice
The bank now hires a government-appointed valuer, who will value the property and arrive at a reserve price (RP) or a minimum bid price. It is a price below which the bank is not allowed to sell that property. If the price fetched exceeds the bank's dues, the excess amount is given to the borrower. Only after arriving at the reserve price, will banks advertise auction-notice. They can publish this only in one English and one regional newspaper, 30 days prior to the auction.
Since information about such notices is limited, one can also look at websites like foreclosureIndia.com and NPAsource.com. These portals give information about the latest properties that are up for auction by banks. However, to register on NPAsource.com, you will have to shell out Rs 18,000 annually to view some 1,000 NPA notices in a year across India.
How to participate in the auction
Interested bidders must submit their bids in a sealed envelope to the bank. Along with the bid, the bidder has to pay 'earnest money deposit'. This deposit is usually 5-10 per cent of the value of the property auctioned. However, this deposit will be refunded in case the bidder doesn't win the bid. Some banks may also charge a nominal fee as tender fees. On the auction day, the sealed envelopes are opened in front of the bidders and the highest bid is announced.
Bidders may or may not get another chance to revise their bids. If the bank has failed at achieving the reserve price, they may postpone the auction or even reduce the valuation of the property. This revision may take another two-three months.
What if you win the bid?:
You have to pay up to 25 per cent of your bid amount within 24 hours to confirm the purchase. The balance amount can be paid in a month or two. This time period given to the buyer varies from banks to banks.
R K Bansal, executive director (retail banking) at IDBI bank, says, "If the property value is huge, the buyer can negotiate with the bank and discuss the tenure within which he can pay the balance amount. The buyer can also get loan to buy that property, if he has a decent credit score."
Since the bank had previously lent against the property, there is clarity on property title. However, these properties are sold on an 'as-is' basis, which means the properties are sold just the way it had been possessed.
"Since the property has been possessed by the banker forcefully, there are chances there may be pending dues or even litigations. For instance, the owner may have some unpaid property taxes, electricity/water bills, society dues and so on. Hence, don't get carried away by the low price of the house, there are chances you may have to pay for such liabilities," says Anshuman Jagtap, advocate at Hariani & Co.
Banks may or may not have information about such liabilities, so it's best to hire a property lawyer and check for such loop-holes before finalising the deal.
http://www.business-standard.com/article/pf/bank-auctioned-homes-may-be-cheaper-113042100495_1.html
The sharp economic downturn has once again brought the problem of bad loans to the forefront.
In its annual report released on Thursday, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) pointed out that the health of the banking system is linked to the credit cycle. “Financial institutions tend to overstretch their lending portfolio during economic booms and tend to retrench the same during economic downturns,” it said.
The market is often abuzz with speculation about the inability of some overleveraged business groups to service their bank loans. India has traditionally had a system that tries to help companies in financial distress, making it easy for them to restructure loans. Even RBI has pointed out that the ability of Indian banks to maintain asset quality is “partly on account of the policy of loans restructuring”.
While bad assets of Indian banks have grown 46% in the fiscal year ended March 2012, the growth pace of credit has been at 17%. On 31 March, gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of the banking system amounted to Rs.1.37 trillion and restructured assets Rs.218 trillion.
To reduce the adverse effects of economic downturns on companies and lenders, corporate debt restructuring (CDR) was introduced by RBI in 2001. Despite success in helping companies emerge out of financial troubles, there are several shortcomings in this mechanism. India continues to miss strong insolvency laws.
Restructuring often involves extension of maturities, lower interest rates, debt forgiveness, among others, in case a firm is unable to repay its debt. Further, loans may or may not get classified as NPAs after they are restructured. A working group set up by RBI to review existing guidelines on loan restructuring has recommended increasing the provisions for accounts which get the asset classification benefit on restructuring. Hence, such restructuring places huge stress on the resources of banks
Such restructuring has also attracted criticism about being partial towards big companies. RBI deputy governor K.C. Chakravarty, in a recent speech, raised an important question: Are small and marginal borrowers discriminated against by the banks? An economic downturn is likely to affect smaller companies more adversely than larger ones, so smaller borrowers should be having a greater share in restructured accounts. The data with RBI does not show this.
The soft corner which Indian banks have for large companies is also highlighted by a recent report by Credit Suisse Group AG, which pointed out that the exposure to 10 large industrial groups constitutes 13% of the entire Indian banking system’s loan assets.
In the absence of effective laws on insolvency, many firms who can’t repay their debts for reasons beyond their control remain orphans, and banks are forced to restructure their loss-making assets at a cost. The Sick Industrial Companies Act (SICA), 1985, enabled sick firms to approach the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) to help them revive.
Under the SICA provisions, a company is classified as sick if it has a track record of erosion of net worth over five years. But what is required is a law, which can detect that a company is going through financial difficulty in earlier, and then attempt to revive it. The lack of infrastructure has resulted in bankruptcy procedures under BIFR to take a long time, something which needs to be addressed. Also, steps should be taken to prevent misuse of BIFR provisions by companies that, under section 22 of SICA, seek immunity from creditors after cooking their accounts; this has plagued efficiency at BIFR for long.
Also asset reconstruction companies (ARCs), which were established by the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, to acquire, manage and recover illiquid loans or NPAs from banks have failed to take off in a big way. The appetite of Indian investors for securities issued by ARCs is weak, and remains limited to short-tenor papers and those with high ratings. A major hindrance in the way of development of securitization in the country has been high stamp duties. Moreover, the Indian credit markets are closely regulated and loans typically don’t trade on a secondary market, unlike developed countries.
These laws are also tilted in favour of creditors whose major goal remains short term, which is to recover their debts. What is needed are sound insolvency laws in our country along the lines of chapter 11 in the US, which can protect firms and help them adopt a suitable strategy to emerge out of financial difficulties.